Departing interim administrator Greg Chemello will on Friday release his final report to the Ipswich community – a 60-page document which describes how Ipswich City Council has changed its ways over the past 16 months.
The report highlights more than 25 key areas of council operations which were either under-performing or which had evolved in a way which allowed inappropriate use of ratepayer funds and/or contributed to poor governance and culture.
It outlines what council has done to rectify this.
As part of his reforms, Mr Chemello – in partnership with a five-member advisory panel – set up an internal whistleblower hotline, encouraging staff to share “inside knowledge”.
“We needed to offer staff a way that they could air the organisation’s dirty laundry, so to speak, within a safe, fair and responsible environment,” Mr Chemello said.
“People needed to know that what they had seen or heard during their time at council could be reported in a respectful space, and would be investigated properly and with the utmost professionalism and privacy.”
The final report, to be officially released Friday, will say that the hotline led to 118 complaints about former mayors, former councillors and current and former staff.
While the direct actions of management were able to resolve many of the complaints, 51 of them were deemed serious enough to be dealt with under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010, Mr Chemello said.
He said this equated to about 60 per cent of Queensland’s PIDs (public interest disclosures) in 2018-19, “remembering that no other council had – or has since – actively encouraged staff to share their knowledge about potential wrongdoing”.
Of the 51 PIDs, 46 have been totally resolved, with the Crime and Corruption Commission and the state’s new Independent Assessor having a role in many of these. Investigations into four others have concluded, and only one remains under investigation.
Allegations raised by staff covered a wide range of potential corruption and misconduct, including:
- Failure to declare and/or manage conflicts of interest;
- Poor project governance;
- Reprisals against disclosers;
- Abuse of power/misuse of authority; decision-making without reasons for decisions and without record-keeping;
- Cronyism;
- Theft;
- Fraud – CV, timesheets, proper recording of payments received;
- Pressure on council suppliers to provide free and discounted services to employee in private capacity when employee had decision-making influence over the supplier’s engagement
- Unauthorised access to emails;
- Failure to protect confidentiality; breach of information privacy;
- Sexual harassment and racial discrimination;
- Breaches or flouting of procurement rules, including co-opting of others or turning a blind eye, or insufficient diligence to enforce rules (tolerance of rule-bending);
- Improper use of council issued credit cards;
- Adequacy of policy and procedures regarding issue and withdrawal of Penalty Infringement Notices;
- Adequacy of policy and procedures in animal management;
- Manipulation of HR processes, for example show cause or performance management to bully/harass/reprise; collusion to manufacture evidence against employee.
Mr Chemello said as a result of the whistleblower investigations, a number of people are no longer employed by council.
“At my first address to council staff way back in early September 2018, I said that it was essential that we deal with any outstanding issues now, and not sweep them under the carpet,” he said.
“It was important that we did that, but also important that we did that in the appropriate way, treating each investigation with the confidentiality and sensitivity it deserved.
“And now that my term is ending, it’s important that the Ipswich community know that we have done this.”
In his final report, Mr Chemello says: “Importantly for ratepayers, no council employee who exited as a result of these investigations was paid any sum outside their specific legal entitlements under either their employment contract or relevant enterprise bargaining agreement. No-one was ‘bought out’ to leave.”
The success of the administration under Mr Chemello begs the question. “Why do we need councils?” We are overgoverned in this country and, given the recent performance of our councils, maybe it’s time for a change. Administrations are not bound by party politics and neither they should be. I’m sure that the Australian public have had a gutful of our pollies over the past five or ten years. It’s time for a change.
Mr Chemello has been doing a great job in Ipswich. Personally, I will be sad to see him leave.
Example – The council workers are now working to their potential, instead of hiding in parks on deck chairs all day, which I used to observe previously to Mr Chemello’s administration.
For a start, we are not a a communist country and because we are a democratic country we require people who will fairly represent us. You say an “Administrator is not bound by Party Politics”. Who is to say they will not be bound by party politics in the future as they are for example in communist countries. We cannot afford to take that chance. Each elected council representative is supposed to keep each other honest and there is no reason why this historical and cultural means of governance ever has to change.
given the extent of corrupt and dysfunction council process it would be appropriate that an independant review panel be established to hear and resolve ratepayers matters that have not been dealt with fairly or legally.
Ratepayers deserve the right of redress and resolution as part of rebuilding the corrupt councils relationship with the community.